PakistanTalk Forum

 

Go Back   PakistanTalk Forums > Defence & Geostrategy > Strategic issues


Strategic issues Forum to discuss Pakistan's strategic Issues related to geostrategy, war on terror and general geo-political and military planning.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2010, 12:13 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
Colonel
 
sonicboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 35
Thanked 147 Times in 118 Posts
Default If US attacks Pakistan

If US attacks Pakistan

June 7, 2010

On May 29, 2010, while quoting the US officials, under the caption, “Options studied for a possible Pakistan strike”, The Washington Post disclosed: “The US military is reviewing options for a unilateral strike in Pakistan in the event that a successful attack on American soil is traced to the country’s tribal areas…ties between the alleged Times Square bomber, Faisal Shahzad, and elements of the Pakistani Taliban have sharpened the Obama administration’s need for retaliatory options.” The Post further elaborated: “The US options for potential retaliatory action rely mainly on air and missile strikes, but could also employ small teams of US Special Operations troops already positioned along the border with Afghanistan.”

The Post also quoted Obama who said “during his campaign for the presidency that he would be willing to order strikes in Pakistan”, and cited Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying after the Times Square attempt that “if, heaven forbid, an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences.”

Although in the last few months, US military and intelligence high officials have been blaming Pakistan for cross-border terrorism in Afghanistan, yet this new threat is a clear indication to attack our country as since 9/1, despite American failed strategy in relation to war on terror in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere in the world.

While Pakistan’s civil and military leadership has repeatedly protested against the attacks by the pilotless aircraft by pointing out that these are likely to affect war against terrorism in the country, but the US policy makers do not bother for any internal backlash. Instead, Washington is considering a full-fledged air attack on Pakistan.

More than eight years after the 9/11 terror attacks in the United States, instead of admitting her blunders due to its flawed strategy of coping with the Islamic militants through military paradigm, playing a double game with Pakistan, despite calling the latter a key American ally in the war on terror, it seems that Washington has decided to attack the tribal regions including some other places without bothering for the dangers of its next blunder.

It seems that the US may demand to send NATO troops in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa or otherwise could intensify its air strikes and ground shelling in the tribal areas of the country under one or the other pretext.

However, any US prospective attack on the Pakistan either on limited scale or vast one will result in immediate and far reaching consequences of dire nature for Pakistan, this region, the United States including the whole world.

In this connection, first of all, Islamabad will be compelled to separate itself from the US war on terror. Then Islamabad is likely to stop fuel supplies to the NATO forces in Afghanistan via the Torkham highway. In this respect, in 2008, the elected government of Pakistan had already temporarily suspended these supplies owing to American air raid at the Angoor Adda coupled with a number of continued strikes.

One of the negative impact of this new strategy is that moderates will join the radicals, providing new ammunition to the Islamic insurgents in Pakistan. In this context, on September 5, 2008, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (JCSC), Gen Tariq Majid had exactly indicated in relation to American attacks in Waziristan that such cross-border strikes would further alienate the locals, proving counterproductive.

Any American aggression in the tribal regions will further organize and increase the number of the Pakistani Taliban as majority of the Pushtun are likely to join with them with a strong resistance against the US-led NATO forces inside the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Such an attack will also sabotage the Pak military operations.

Although at present Pakistani security forces are engaged in fighting against the Taliban in some tribal areas so as restore the writ of the civil government, yet in case of US full-fledged invasion, there will certainly more unity among the elected government, security forces and the general masses, consequently massive hostility towards Washington. In that scenario, American policy of liberalism led by moderate parties could badly fail, giving a greater incentive to the fundamentalist and extremist elements in the country.

If the US isolates Pakistan by imposing sanctions, such an act will also cause drastic impact on the American war against terrorism, damaging its interests in the region�which is part of its global strategy. Pakistan’s economic crisis could reach climax in that scenario. But converting our country into a failed state through any aggression will equally harm American interests. A greater political and economic instability in the country could make a majority of general masses revengeful against the Americans, which is likely to join Jehadist groups both inside the country and Afghanistan, culminating in massive attacks on the US-led coalition forces.

So besides Pakistan, US will itself face multi-faceted implications internally and externally due to its attack on Pakistan. In this regard, American cost of war has reached approximately 7 trillion dollars�decline of dollar, financial crisis and acute recession inside the country have given a greater blow to the US economy vis-�-vis other developed countries. Intensity of these problems is likely to lead America towards downfall. Disintegration of the British Empire and the former Soviet Union offers a drastic lesson to Washington in this respect. While indicating the causes of the collapse of the former Russia, once the former President Gorbachev had said that war in Afghanistan proved a bleeding wound for the Soviet Union. Now Pakistan, if attacked, is likely to prove the same wound for Americans who are already fighting war on terror on global and regional level.

US must also realize that in case of any prospective military action in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa or beyond this province, both Iran and Pakistan might stand together to frustrate the US strategic designs. Further an alliance of both the countries with Syria would make the matter worse for Washington. In that worse scenario, a vast region from Pakistan to Somalia and Nigeria to Iraq and Uzbekistan will further be radicalized, bringing about more terrorism, directed against the Americans.

Nevertheless, in such adverse circumstances, American worldwide interests are likely to be jeopardized in these countries and the whole of Middle East where America has already failed in coping with the Islamic militants through traditional tactics of power factor in one or the other way.

It is mentionable that most of the US-led NATO allies like, France, Germany and Australia are, in fact, reluctant to maintain their troops in Afghanistan for a long time because of a sense of insecurity. Canada has announced to withdraw its troops this year. So because of a prolonged war in Afghanistan, in case of targeting Pakistan, most of the American allies could leave the US war on terror, and that fact could create a greater rift between the US on one side and other members on the other.

Moreover, American such a ‘hot pursuit policy’, followed by a new strategy towards Pakistan could lead to clash of civilizations, popularly known as Word War 111 between the Muslims and the Christians on international level.

Nonetheless, in face of the already deteriorated law and order situation in Pakistan, we will have to protect our interests by a well-defined strategy in case of any American strike which is likely to convert into an allout war between Pakistan and America. In this context, there must be a strong sense of unity among our defence forces, politicians and the general masses which is essential to thwart the nefarious designs of the United States. :. Implications of US Strike in Pakistan, Kashmir Watch, June 7, By Sajjad Shaukat

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations. Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

Rupee News
sonicboom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2010, 08:21 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
Lt. Colonel
 
Jana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Land of the Guns
Posts: 765
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: If US attacks Pakistan

Well i dont think so Iran will side with Pakistan in case US attack Pakistan.

But i also dont think that US will take the risk to create more attackers trargeting every single US interest, so i think US will avoid any silly misadvantuer
Jana is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jana For This Useful Post:
Lady Macbeth (06-10-2010), Selma Shirazi (06-10-2010)
Old 06-08-2010, 09:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
Lieutenant
 
UmairP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 64
Thanks: 23
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Default Re: If US attacks Pakistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonicboom View Post
If US attacks Pakistan

June 7, 2010


Nonetheless, in face of the already deteriorated law and order situation in Pakistan, we will have to protect our interests by a well-defined strategy in case of any American strike which is likely to convert into an allout war between Pakistan and America. In this context, there must be a strong sense of unity among our defence forces, politicians and the general masses which is essential to thwart the nefarious designs of the United States. :. Implications of US Strike in Pakistan, Kashmir Watch, June 7, By Sajjad Shaukat

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations. Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

Rupee News
This is something US won't like and for that US won't attack us.

Proxy war seem more likely than a full fledge attack.
UmairP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2010, 04:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
PSR Analyst
Captain
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay area No Calif
Posts: 201
Thanks: 174
Thanked 89 Times in 59 Posts
Default Re: If US attacks Pakistan

Hi,

If the U S says that it will attack pakistan under certain circumstances----then it is a given that it will----no ifs and buts about it.

The united states has gone past that stage of empty rhetoric and meaningless threats a long time ago. Let's not dwell on that idea the same way OBL did after 9/11. The american president is under too much pressure from the public to do something.

And the case of pakistan has been prepped in front of the american public for awhile now---just like the lamb is readied before the slaughter or you marinate the steak before you put it on the grill---an attack on pakistan has been readied for sometime now.

Now if pak is attacked from one side by the americans---then obviously the indians may take advantage of the situation from the other side.

the delivery of our main weapons systems depends on our co-operation---like the blk52's---the amraams---OHP---P3c's and everything else taht is in the pipepline.

Pakistan army needs to start up another strike in the northern areas as a primary cleanseup target and a secondary strike in the punjab----bahawalpur area for punjabi taliban---as well as in the areas around jhang.
__________________
THE FACE OF EVIL IS EXTREMELY ORDINARY
Mastankhan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mastankhan For This Useful Post:
Jihad (06-10-2010), Lady Macbeth (06-10-2010), Neo (06-08-2010)
Old 06-08-2010, 08:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
Lieutenant
 
Jihad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam/The Netherlands
Posts: 96
Thanks: 25
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: If US attacks Pakistan

If If If....

I don't think the Americans have any intentions to attack us head on or whatever.
Their capacities are overstretched at the moment.

We're actually already under attack by them, for alot of years now.
The funny thing is, we don't really realize it or know it, but it's due to them that we're in this f*cking mess.

Whether it be media bias by them, or simple drone attacks which automatically undermine our sovereignty..... we are constantly under attack , and our weak and undecisive leadership doesn't know how to react to this.

Perhaps they need some lessons in honor and dignity, maybe pay a visit to Mr. Ahmedinejad himself, see how he got the Americans off his back, lol. (even if it's for the time being).

Last edited by Jihad; 06-08-2010 at 09:04 PM.
Jihad is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jihad For This Useful Post:
Condor (06-10-2010), Lady Macbeth (06-10-2010), Neo (06-08-2010), Selma Shirazi (06-10-2010)
Old 06-10-2010, 08:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
Colonel
 
Selma Shirazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,372
Thanks: 156
Thanked 99 Times in 71 Posts
Default Re: If US attacks Pakistan

US can make as many plans and sand modles as they wish but every time they have to calculate the cost of any military intervention against world's 6th most populaous country and one with more nukes than anyone can grab in first wave of attack. Enough will be left to eliminate major US'interets in the region.

Certain factors have to be considered here:
The UNSC council: China is a permanent member and as long as Pakistan doesn't get rogue, UN P5 will not pass any resolution to attack Pakistan.

Nukes: The nuclear factor is the key to our security and existance. Does US have means to grab all our nukes and secure them? Probably not and Pakistan could retalliate.

Muslim allies and OIC: Pakistan is no Iraq or Afghanistan; she's a country with lot more influence and friends in the Islamic world than anyone..further more, we're the only muslim country with nuclear infrastructure which makes us more attractive to any arab or muslim country. KSA, Turkey, BD and most probably Iran will side with Pakistan. Others like Malaysia and Indonesia may follow. Is US willing start a third world war?

Economic cost: A war against Pakistan will be much costlier than GF I+II or Afghan War. Pakistan may not survive, but can USA afford to spend another half a billion to a trillion dollars for an expansive war without hurting its taxpayer?

Aftermath: Will the world be a safer place with Pakistan disintegrated in smaller and most propapbly anti-US countries?
Selma Shirazi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Selma Shirazi For This Useful Post:
Condor (06-10-2010), Lady Macbeth (06-10-2010), Neo (06-10-2010)
Old 06-10-2010, 05:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
Neo
Administrator
Lt. General
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 8,957
Thanks: 516
Thanked 448 Times in 372 Posts
Default Re: If US attacks Pakistan

Drone attacks may intensify but as long as Pakistan is a nuclear state, USA won't attack. So indeed, those war designs made by US think tank will remain a fantasy or a wet dream for many.

US made hundreds if not more plans to eliminate the Soviet Union and China during the Cold War, none was materialized.
Neo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 - Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.