Sino-Indian tensions over Kashmir
EDITORIAL (September 04 2010): China has refused visa to an Indian general, interestingly for Pakistan, because he oversees military operations in a 'disputed' area. Lieutenant General B.S. Jaswal, the top military officer in Indian-occupied Kashmir was to travel to China to participate in a high-level exchange programme.
Predictably, the incident has caused outrage in India, where the Chinese Ambassador was summoned for a formal protest, and the main Opposition party, the BJP, termed it "worst kind of insult inflicted upon India." This though, is not the first time that China has annoyed India over the issue. For a while, it has hardened its position on Kashmir. Last year, it adopted a dual visa issuing policy for Indian citizens and Kashmiris, for whom the visas were stamped on separate papers, instead of Indian passports. Needless to say, Delhi disallowed Kashmiris to travel on those visas, terming them invalid.
However, like last year, the present spat is unlikely to have a negative impact on bilateral relations. Indian Defence Minister A.K. Antony has been quick to say that the "ties with China will continue," while another official tried to paper over obvious discord, saying no defence exchange has been cancelled, and that the matter is being resolved. Defence exchanges between the two counties are already limited, but trade and commerce have been expanding fast. China, at present, is India's biggest trading partner. Bilateral deals have grown thirty-fold during the last decade, and are expected to surpass the $60 billion mark this year. Both sides, of course, would want this mutually beneficial relationship to stay strong.
But China and India are two emerging global giants, gearing up for a long-term contest for influence. The present case is a sign of China's new assertive mood. It has already attained great clout, and last month, officially overtook Japan as the world's second largest economy. Both countries are competing for energy and raw materials in different parts of the world. In order to promote broader relations, they decided, a while ago, to postpone resolution of the border dispute for later. Many have been suggesting that Pakistan should also adopt the same pragmatic policy, and normalise relations with India, putting the Kashmir issue on the backburner. The two situations, though, are quite different. While one is purely a border dispute, the other is about a people's right to determine their future.
The truth of the matter is that in the 1962 Sino-Indian war, which ended in a humiliating defeat for India, the Chinese emerged victorious both in Kashmir's Ladakh region and in the North-East Frontier Agency (NEFA) located south of Tibet, taking over the territories they claimed as theirs. But they declared unilateral cease-fire and withdrew from most areas. China's existing border dispute is related largely to Arunachal Pradesh. Upping of the ante over the Kashmir region could be seen as a move aimed at strengthening old friendships, such as with Pakistan, with a view to shaping a favourable future.
Business Recorder [Pakistan's First Financial Daily]