PakistanTalk Forum

 

Go Back   PakistanTalk Forums > Politics, Social & Economic Issues > Humanities


Humanities Discussions on History, Philosophy, Relgion and Ethics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-2009, 11:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Neo
Administrator
Lt. General
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 8,955
Thanks: 515
Thanked 447 Times in 371 Posts
Default The miscalculation which doomed Musharraf!

The miscalculation which doomed Musharraf!


ARTICLE (August 25 2009): Mystifying, many a time, are the ways of the Almighty! Both His blessings and His thunderbolts can come in ways no one could predict or foresee. Aitzaz Ahsan who stood firm and steadfast, along with his eminent colleagues and thousands of lawyers, throughout the 2-year ordeal faced by the CJP Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry and the judiciary and eventually got massive political support for a great cause, made very interesting revelations the other day, about the fateful and somewhat bizarre happenings of March 2007, which had long-term consequences.

According to him, the rejection of the Pakistan Steel Mill privatisation deal by the Supreme Court under CJP Chaudhry, was considered such an affront by the then-PM Shaukat Aziz that it was thought necessary to punish the troublesome CJP. However, President Musharraf had also been chafing at the way the CJP was doggedly pursuing the missing persons' cases and in the process, stepping on toes of recalcitrant high officials who were the President's instruments in making persons disappear.

But the problem was that those officials were merely carrying out Musharraf's orders, who in turn was obeying American diktat and, by self admission, getting paid for surrendering Pakistanis, suspected by them, of involvement in anti-American activities. For these missing persons waited a horrible fate in the torture chambers of Guantanamo Bay.

In fact, the reasons actually given by Musharraf in taking action against the CJP were in the main, centered on the alleged "humiliation" of government officials and other functionaries connected with the "missing persons'" disappearances. Therefore, preparation of a case for moving the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) against the CJP (the prescribed procedure) began feverishly.

Soon a pile of documents was generated, which was to be presented to the Council, if need be, as proof of CJP's wrongdoing. Now the preliminary dossier, so put together, contained much garbage and (for the accusers) self-incriminating material, which would have been normally removed before being presented to any forum, had some legal person had had a chance to scrutinise and evaluate them.

The dossier just lay there, unexamined, unevaluated, uncorrected! At this time, as Aitzaz reveals, some one suggested to the all-powerful Army Chief and President: why bother about "referring the case" to the Council, which may take time. Instead, why not just haul up the CJP and ask him to resign, presumably, with a carrot and stick approach. That, the adviser predicted, would solve the "problem" in no time! Not surprisingly, the idea appealed to Musharraf.

After all, who had ever dared to say "no" to him? Had not, at his bidding, Prime Ministers come and Prime Ministers gone, quietly and without fuss, like so many mice? So the CJP was hauled up and in the presence of the PM and top brass, asked to resign or else! And then the unthinkable happened! CJP Chaudhry refused to oblige!

The TV image of Musharraf glaring at the CJP and the CJP defiantly returning that look, lingers in the mind. The formula that had so often worked like magic with many (oh, so many) others, was allegedly tried on the redoubtable CJP. Carrots worth untold amounts, a prestigious and lucrative position in an international jurisprudence body on the one hand and threat of dire consequences on the other, were allegedly held out, directly and later, through intermediaries. But the CJP stood like a rock.

The apple cart was irretrievably upset! Musharraf, the all-powerful President and Army Chief, had a totally new situation on his hands! So confident he had been that no other drop scene to this adventure was possible, except the one he had in mind, that an exit strategy, in case things did not happen as planned, was not built into the plan and no fall back stratagem chalked up before hand.

While the CJP was under virtual arrest at the Army House, another drama was being played out at the Supreme Court premises: a new CJP, justice Javed Iqbal was sworn in and embraced in congratulation by no other than the later PCO CJP Abdul Hameed Dogar. There were now two CJPs in the country! While one was still in office, another had been sworn in! Musharraf was trapped in a cul-de-sac.

This was no ordinary dead end! A panic, high stakes, situation, if ever there was one! It was now imperative that CJP Chaudhry be rendered "dysfunctional" in a hurry. Now, under the circumstances, the only way this could be done under the constitution was to bring serious charges against the CJP and refer his "case" to the Supreme Judicial Council for a decision, pending which the CJP would remain suspended.

As Aitzaz Ahsan describes (though this is not a verbatim recounting) in his cool, dispassionate, objective way, his tone all sweetness and without a trace of rancor, some sycophant or another said: no problem! A case against CJP Chaudhry was already prepared and ready for launch. The "case", on the other hand, was anything but ready!

And so it was that on that fateful occasion in March 2007, a very raw case against an upright, courageous and honest CJP was launched, with documents allegedly full of innuendo (against members of the judiciary) of a less than decent nature and containing other patently contradictory statements, that could be noticed and thrown out with a cursory glance. Such was the dossier, which was thus, submitted to the Supreme Judicial Council, arguably the highest judicial body in the country.

As the drama unfolded, the bulky dossier of supposedly incriminating material was reportedly disowned by legal wizards usually hired at unbelievably high fees with money belonging to the people. Not surprisingly, the SJC threw out the case with a unanimous decision and slapped a hefty fine on the government, which added disgrace to defeat.

This was the one fateful misstep, among others, that eventually paved the way for a less than graceful exit (despite the meaningless pomp and ceremony attending the departure) for the President and Army Chief Musharraf, for eight long years the unchallenged master of the country! Take warning, then, O ye with eyes (to see)! - Al Qur'an (59/2). (owajid@yahoo.com)
Neo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 11:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
Neo
Administrator
Lt. General
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 8,955
Thanks: 515
Thanked 447 Times in 371 Posts
Default Re: The miscalculation which doomed Musharraf!

His trial is not the only issue


EDITORIAL (August 25 2009): To the extent, whether or not, General Musharraf is guilty of committing the offence of high treason by abrogating the constitution, the issue stands settled in the wake of the Supreme Court's July 31 landmark judgement in the judges' case. He has earned the guilty verdict for his Emergency of November 3rd 2007, which the 14-member bench of the apex court declared a violation of the constitution.

Well before the court verdict, while still at the helm, Musharraf had confessed to breaching the constitution in interviews given to the news media. So now the million dollar question is: what is holding back the federal government from taking the next legally obligated step of initiating trial proceedings against Pervez Musharraf?

Nawaz Sharif is impatient with the government's apparent reluctance in moving the court against his erstwhile tormentor; his ultimate argument being that the government is duty bound to follow the constitution. He finds no justification for an argument about the suitability of the circumstances to initiate proceedings against General Musharraf, whose action of November 3, 2007 was bereft of any parliamentary amnesty.

Prime Minister Gilani says it is not "doable". Earlier, he had tried to hide behind a curious move by asking the National Assembly to bring a consensus resolution demanding the trial of the former dictator - which he knew full well was not feasible.

Then, there was also an argument, proffered by the PPP quarters that putting General Musharraf on trial means seeking revenge, which the party would not resort to, in deference to a call by Benazir Bhutto and Bilawal Bhutto Zardari that 'democracy is the best revenge'.

The question is, can a constitutional obligation be held hostage to a perception? Is it legally correct to put off implementation of a constitutional provision in order to meet commitments by a group of leaders, with vested interests to their common patrons abroad? How to condone foreign interference -whether invited or imposed - in resolving differences between certain parties and their leaders in a breach of the constitution? And, fundamentally, can the rule of law be subordinated to the national interest?

Obviously, the present government is not in a position, or may not like, to say 'yes' or 'no' in answer to any of these questions. But it knows that the PML (N) is as much, perhaps more, interested in projecting the Musharraf-trial issue for the public gallery, than really going in for the kill. To a perceptive mind, there is a dimension of public sparring and shadow boxing to the whole affair as it attracts public attention.

It is no more a secret that both Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto were allowed return from their exiles under agreements put together with the help of some of Pakistan's closest foreign friends. In return, both had committed to act along an agreed line of action, which culminated in an honourable exit of General Pervez Musharraf.

The said arrangement has, of late, been extensively reported in the national media, literally taking the wind out of PML (N)'s sails. Of course, there is merit to the high treason charge against General Musharraf, but keeping it under sharp focus for public debate at the cost of more pressing national issues, is nothing but crass political opportunism.

One wonders why the PML (N) didn't table its own resolution in the National Assembly. Was it afraid of a fuller debate on the issue which, by way of exposing the issue, would have brought to the fore some unsavoury facts of the deal. It is a hard fact that more often than not, in Pakistan, it was always excessive politicking that opened the doors on usurpers.

And there is no disputing the fact that, invariably, without questioning the constitutionality of the 'new dawn', the people would hail the military ruler as good riddance from corrupt politicians. We don't know, yet, if the people want to get rid of ineffective, querulous civilian rulers. We also don't know if the proactive judiciary has locked out the Bonapartists by putting in place some lethal disincentives.

But we do know that the civilian rulers' trajectory of public support is no more in ascendance. While people's basic problems remain unresolved, the important members of the ruling elite are obsessed with personal self-aggrandisement, their eyes fixed on their careers and prospects. Resultantly, issues like General Musharraf's treason trial that should have been out of the way in the very first few months, are still hanging like an albatross around the nation's neck.

So, the government, in fact, the entire elected paraphernalia, is at the dire risk of losing relevance to the public. One must not forget that people's love for democracy is contingent upon its ability to help deliver. They cannot be expected to fight for something they don't love or cherish.
Neo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 08:08 AM   #3 (permalink)
PDR Ambassador
Major
 
Araz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 459
Thanks: 20
Thanked 72 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: The miscalculation which doomed Musharraf!

I think Musharraf had really bad advice. He should have ignored the CJP,s persuit of missing persons and gone to him wtith a genuine question of whether he could help him get over the crisis of simulataneous rule from general to the president. I strongly suspect had he gone to the CJP, the CJP would have obliged him and we would still have had a stable government, rather than this band of lethargic and clueless idiots . Such a shame and that too after having done reasonably well both for himself and for pakistan.
Araz
__________________
If I am all for others , who will be for me, and if I am all for myself who am I? If not now When?
Araz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 11:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Neo
Administrator
Lt. General
 
Neo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 8,955
Thanks: 515
Thanked 447 Times in 371 Posts
Default Re: The miscalculation which doomed Musharraf!

CJP and Lalmasjid will go down in history as black chapters in Musharraf's government. I was surprised as much I was disappointed to see those bad dicisions which probably cost him his carreer. :(
Neo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 09:07 AM   #5 (permalink)
PDR Ambassador
Major
 
Araz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 459
Thanks: 20
Thanked 72 Times in 52 Posts
Default Re: The miscalculation which doomed Musharraf!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo View Post
CJP and Lalmasjid will go down in history as black chapters in Musharraf's government. I was surprised as much I was disappointed to see those bad dicisions which probably cost him his carreer. :(
neo it is typical of People who are used to making decisions by themselves. Running of governments should be a consensus process, where you rely on the advice of technocrats whom you can trust to tell the truth at all times. A tyrrant cannot tolerate disagreement--Remember ZIA__Justice Samdani episode!! As such he surrounds or gets surrounded by Yes men, who will end up causing his down fall.
Araz
__________________
If I am all for others , who will be for me, and if I am all for myself who am I? If not now When?
Araz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 - Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.