PakistanTalk Forum

 

Go Back   PakistanTalk Forums > World Politics & Defence > Global Politics & Defense


Global Politics & Defense Forum to discuss international politics, defense and military topics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2010, 10:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
Colonel
 
sonicboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 35
Thanked 144 Times in 116 Posts
Default U.S. military officials press new tactics against Taliban

U.S. military officials press new tactics against Taliban

By DAVID S. CLOUD - Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON U.S. military officials racing to make progress in Afghanistan are pressing new tactics to choke off the flow of Taliban fighters and bomb-making materials from Pakistan into key battlefields of the south, with some even advocating cross-border attacks, according to several U.S. civilian and military officials.

Two senior officers from the staff of Gen. David H. Petraeus, the U.S. general who commands NATO forces in Afghanistan, are scheduled to meet with Pakistani counterparts this week, a senior NATO official said, in part to present intelligence about Taliban operations in Baluchistan, a Pakistan province along Afghanistan's southern border.

The focus on southern Afghanistan is a response to the difficulties the U.S. has encountered this year in Kandahar and neighboring Helmand Province, where the U.S. has sent tens of thousands of additional troops.


Offensives in the region, the heartland of the Taliban movement, have struggled to clear guerrilla fighters who melt into the local population. U.S. and Afghan officials have in many areas not been able to establish stable government and improve services, priorities in the effort to win the hearts and minds of Afghan civilians.

Petraeus is facing a deadline from the White House to show progress in the war by next July, and officials said he is pushing the Pakistani military to confront the Taliban.

"We're going to take this fight to the edge," said one official. "We're not going to back off from the fight."

Long a Taliban stronghold, Kandahar and parts of Helmand have remained violent in part because of the ongoing infiltration of fighters over the border. The Taliban leadership fled across the border into the Baluchistan capital, Quetta, after the U.S. invasion of 2001, and some members are believed to be directing the insurgency from there.

Maj. Gen. Mike Flynn and Maj. Gen. William Mayville plan to share U.S. intelligence about Taliban efforts to recruit fighters in refugee camps in Pakistan and locations where it loads ammonium nitrate, a key chemical in homemade bombs, to be smuggled over the border crossings, officials said.

The goal, U.S. officials said, is to persuade the Pakistani military to crack down on these activities.

Some steps to secure Kandahar are already under way, including the use of reconnaissance drones along the border to increase surveillance of smuggling routes and efforts to crack down on corruption. Officials say they are improving training and pay for Afghan border guards, and installing screening devices along the frontier to examine shipments.

The majority of U.S. casualties this year have been in the south. A total of 575 U.S. and allied troops have been killed so far this year, according to the website icasualties.org. That is the higher number on record for the war, now in its 10th year, but the website does not break this year's casualties down by location.

U.S. officials say they have begun to see a reduction in homemade bombs in southern Afghanistan, a sign that their efforts might be working.

But other U.S. military officials say that lasting stability in southern Afghanistan is impossible as long as the Taliban can operate with relative freedom in Baluchistan. Some U.S. military personnel involved in the debate are skeptical that even high-level U.S. pressure on Pakistan will produce results.

Some U.S. officials say Islamabad has long refused to take decisive action against the Taliban leadership. For that reason, they argue, unilateral U.S. operations in Baluchistan should be considered, including airstrikes or secret raids by special operations forces.

Even small-scale operations by U.S. special forces into Pakistan, unless conducted jointly with Pakistani forces, would infuriate officials in Islamabad and probably would provoke a backlash even worse than that seen earlier this month when Pakistan closed a key border crossing to NATO supply convoys for 11 days after a U.S. helicopter attack killed two Pakistani border guards.

Military officials said that the recent rash of border incidents involving U.S. helicopters crossing into Pakistani territory and the escalation of CIA drone strikes in Pakistan's North Waziristan district was not directly related to the debate about additional military steps in the south.

Pakistan points to its offensives last year in the Swat Valley, South Waziristan and other tribal areas in the western part of the country as proof that it is serious about taking on the Pakistani Taliban. But it says its military is stretched and cannot do more.

Most U.S. efforts to disrupt insurgent activity in Pakistan also have been farther north, in the lawless tribal areas.

Airstrikes by unmanned drones operated by the CIA have been carried out almost exclusively in the tribal area, with tacit support and even secret assistance from the Pakistani government. In addition, most of the incidents in which U.S. forces fired into Pakistan or crossed the border while pursuing insurgents have come in the tribal regions.

Pakistani sensitivities about Baluchistan are more acute than about the tribal belt, and officials played down the possibility that Petraeus would approve cross-border attacks in the south - even as they conceded that some military officers are promoting the idea.

"I suspect there probably are advocates for putting more pressure on Pakistan, who feel they have been given enough time to act," said the senior NATO official. "But I would tell you that at senior levels that is not under consideration."

Senior Obama administration officials also have not approved broadening the attacks beyond the tribal belt, and the military personnel who agreed to discuss the ongoing debate would only do so anonymously because of the sensitive nature of the deliberations.

They stressed that the idea remains controversial even among U.S. commanders in Kabul, with some advocating the move out of frustration that Pakistani military has refused to move against bomb-making facilities and refugee camps that the Taliban uses to recruit fighters and suicide bombers, who cross into Afghanistan to carry out attacks.



Read more: U.S. military officials press new tactics against Taliban - Wire - Lifestyle - bellinghamherald.com
sonicboom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 - Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.