Quote:
Originally Posted by Zob
the problem is that there are two sides to history the indian view and then the pakistani view & then there is a 3RD which is the truth!!!
inorder to find out the truth you need to find out the arabic view of the situation back then!
|
And why should one believe that the Arabic view would be truthful? Just like the American view of Iraqi WMDs?
Also what is this
Pakistani view? Is it any different from the Arab view? How?
Quote:
and please do not forget muslim history in the sub continent has been meddled with by hindus as well as the British...so Muslim view has become very apologetic and has been watered down...and rulers like Jalludin have become famous and started being called Jallaludin Akbar.....may i ask why?
the answer is simple he was adored by the non muslims making him famous giving him titles....and if you look at him from purely a religious point of view then i guess he was a damned soul....but then again history has been rewritten and portrayed as wished by the victorious......
|
Akbar killed 15000 Rajput civilians after a battle in Rajasthan. He was better only in comparison to others who were even worse.